So much for that....

[colet at code-energy.com (Cole Tuininga)]

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:15:22AM -0500, David Kramer wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, John Tsangaris wrote:
> 
> I may say to my wife: "I heard there's a 60% chance of rain today.  I
> think you should bring an umbrella to work.  Do you have one, or do you
> need to borrow one from me?"
> 
> In order to even START communicating things like this in a computer
> language (not counting stupid cheating ways like in print statements or
> nouns for variable names), you need to:
> 
> (1) Have a class heirarchy that contains all objects in the universe,
> real, imaginary, or theoretical, complete with hundreds (on the average)
> of methods each.  And you thought the Human Genome project was big,

I think I'd have to disagree with this.

Do you understand all the concepts of nuclear physics?  Quantum 
mechanics? (etc)

( If you do, congrats *smile* )

My point being, this knowledge is unneccessary.  All that IS necessary
is knowledge of the data that's involved.  Now, admittedly, this is 
still not a minor dataset but not *quite* as large.  8)

-- 
I haven't lost my mind!  It's backed up on disk somewhere...

Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
Code Energy, Inc
colet at code-energy.com
(603) 766-2208
PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D