BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- Subject: [Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:36:31 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20170621103107.GF12474@newtao.randomstring.org>
- References: <d9a923b4-ecb4-75bb-8dd7-58879c48a214@gmail.com> <22853.33313.766976.105278@blazemonger.com> <6ae28d8f-4c0a-ed5c-0aec-e6a60c57f1df@gmail.com> <ad7010b0-7f89-2027-35cc-bdb1d573df08@gmail.com> <20170621103107.GF12474@newtao.randomstring.org>
On 6/21/2017 6:31 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: > What are the advantages you see over another mini-ITX server > like the HP? It is a mini-ITX server, one that happens to be designed for network attached storage and comes with a vendor-supported, Linux-based operating system. I think a better question is why didn't I get a "real" mini-ITX server? I *hate* working in anything smaller than a mid-tower so DIY was off the table. The HP MicroServers haven't been refreshed in a long time, and more recent options like the FreeNAS Mini cost 20-30% more than Synology and QNAP for about the same thing. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] WD My Cloud PR4100
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] WD My Cloud PR4100
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] WD My Cloud PR4100
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] WD My Cloud PR4100
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] MIT parking options
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Forgot we can
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Fun with Synology (was WD My Cloud PR4100)
- Index(es):
