Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Reliable version?



On 29 Nov 97 at 17:47, Rich Braun <richb at pioneer.ci.net> wrote:

> Should I bag my old installation and overhaul it with a new distribution, or
> should I take the time to figure out what's wrong with this setup?  Or should
> I just go to one of the 2.1 experimental kernels?  If so, which is the most
> stable version folks here have experience with?
My experience as a software engineer tells me to stick with something 
stable, but some of the new features are somewhat necessary. My 
preference would be to try to figure out where the problem is, maybe 
just rebuild the kernel.
+----------------------------------------------+
Gerald Feldman <gaf at mediaone.net>
Boston Computer Solutions and Consulting




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org