Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To write SGML or HTML?



If this is purely a slide presentation that you're going to showing in
a browser, and maybe putting up on the web for future reference, I'd say
HTML.

If this is documentation that has other requirements, e.g.,

	- needs to be structured in a way that programs can easily parse it for data 
	- or can convert from the storage format to a
	  variety of presentation formats (HTML, PDF, LaTeX, etc)
	- Needs to be integrated into a larger documentation project

then I'd say go with XML or SGML.

There's a lot to be said for using what you already know, esp. if the task
is something simple and small like a slide presentation, as opposed to
building the engineering documentation library for the Boeing 767.

Does anyone remember if the LDP is moving towards some sort of XML or SGML?
Or was XML going to be used as the document file format for gnome?



> Question?  When it comes to writing documentation these days, what
> arguments could be made for the various mark up languages?
> 
> I'm starting to whip out my presentation for the Video4Linux demo
> in December, and I'd like to know whether or not it's worth learning
> yet another mark-up (SGML) ? 
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 
> 
> - Christoph
> 

***
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to discuss-request at blu.org




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org