questions about distributions

[pfarrar at learningco.com (pfarrar at learningco.com)]

     I've played with a little Caldera and Red Hat, but most my Linux 
     experience is with Slackware.  It's the first distribution I 
     installed, and I've seen no reason to change.
     
     Some differences:
     Slackware is somewhat different than Caldera or Red Hat.  Packages are 
     distributed as Tarballs, not RPMs.  There is a utility to convert RPMs 
     to Tarballs, though I've never had a need to use it.  Slackware uses 
     BSD style init scripts.  Instead of having run level directories, 
     there are run level scripts.  I find this very simple to follow .  
     Apache has a non-standard root location: /var/lib/apache/.  Setup is a 
     very simple to follow text interface; not fancy like RHat and Caldera, 
     but easier to use than I recall Debian's to be.
     
     SMP? no se
     
     Focus:
     I see it as a network/development focused distribution.  Less emphasis 
     has been put on cool window managers than I see on Red Hat and 
     Caldera.  The Slackware website has this to say:

      The Slackware Philosophy
      Since its first release in April of 1992, the Slackware Linux 
      Project has aimed at producing the most "UNIX-like" Linux 
      distribution out there. Slackware complies with the published Linux 
      standards, such as the Linux File System Standard. We have always 
      considered simplicity and stability paramount, and as a result 
      Slackware has become one of the most popular, stable, and friendly 
      distributions available. 
     
     ...
     OK, I guess that was a little more than 20 words.
     
     -Peter
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from ns.learningco.com ([198.112.0.7]) by mail.learningco.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.12) id 00000C0B; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:36:40 -0500
Received: by ns.learningco.com; id PAA01771; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:40:13 -0500
(EST)
Received: from tarnhelm.blu.org(207.31.228.20) by ns.learningco.com via smap
(V5.0)
	id xma001741; Tue, 11 Jan 00 15:39:50 -0500
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA01293
	for discuss-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:21:54 -0500
Received: from gw16i.fmr.com (gw16e.fmr.com [192.223.252.80])
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01290
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:21:52 -0500
Received: (from smtp at localhost)
	by gw16i.fmr.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA28151
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:21:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from msgbos101nts.fmr.com(137.199.100.30) by gw16i.fmr.com via smap
(V2.0)
	id xma027891; Tue, 11 Jan 00 15:21:17 -0500
Received: from cso.fmr.com (cso-1.fmr.com [192.168.201.200]) by
msgbos101nts.fmr.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2448.0)
	id ZX71SBNM; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:21:14 -0500
Received: from cso.fmr.com (darkstar [172.26.201.191])
	by cso.fmr.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20362
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:21:14 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200001112021.PAA20362 at cso.fmr.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: discuss at Blu.Org
Subject: questions about distributions
X-url: http://www.linuxsoup.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:20:47 -0500
From: Christoph Doerbeck A242369 <cdoerbec at cso.fmr.com>
Sender: owner-discuss at blu.org
Precedence: bulk