Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

The future of linux



Derek I think you are right, the real issue is probably installing /
upgrading applications. This tends to be the real baga-boo on all systems
though, not just linux.

The RedHat installation process is easy enough compared to win. But what
happens when the system gets out of wack?  I personally think RPM is all
fine and good, but the upgrade option only seems to work without a hitch
about 25% of the time.  What linux really needs is an idiot proof software
installer /  upgrader / fixer-uper.  Clearly RPM could be a good starting
point. 

Note that windows users quite often hose their systems, and that Mom might
not be able to restore her system to usability without a very painful call
to some tech support service.  We need to be better than that, don't we?


On 31 Jan 2000, Derek Atkins wrote:
> 
> As for maintainence of the machine.. what happens if the machine
> crashes?  Linux isn't quite as user-friendly in terms of coming
> back online.

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org