SuSE lays off much of its US staff

[rek2 at screamdesign.com (rek2)]

and in short words... Mandrake is lot more stable and bug free than RedHat...
I move (for my desktop) from debian to Mandrake... casue for desktop is way 
way better,,, for servers I won't say nothing since I never try it like a 
server I use slackware and debian servers... I think if you whant to use 
Mandrake for a server you will have to do a lot of rpm cleanning :)


christian
Metro West Boston LUG
http://www.linuxbusca.com/mwblug


El Jueves 08 Febrero 2001 12:59, Brian J. Conway escribi)B?:
> > Why is Mandrake still around if Redhat comes with KDE?  Wasn't Mandrakes
> > primary concern KDE?  I know I'm missing something - just not sure what.
>
> For one thing, all packages are optimized for pentium-class processors
> and higher, which I have found makes a great difference overall.  The
> installation is a lot easier, prettier, and more customizable.  It also
> includes a lot more bleeding-edge features that RedHat still lacks, like
> ReiserFS, which has been in the Mandrake install for a long time.  A
> working compiler also comes to mind *cough*.  I switched to Mandrake
> from RedHat a while ago, and have no intention of going back anytime
> soon.
>
> Brian J. Conway
> dogbert at clue4all.net
> Geek for hire: http://clue4all.net/resume
>
> Men may control the free world, but women control the boobs.
> (http://www.pvponline.com/archive.php3?archive=20001024)
> -
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
> message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).