Rumors of MS involvement in Apache advisory

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

Commercial software vendors have schedules set up. 
Bug gets reported. Placed into some problem reporting mechanism.
Bug fixer gets it, checks it out, maybe comes up with a fix. 
The fix goes into the source tree. 
Then, when  the next scheduled release comes out, the fix should be in 
there.
There is no requirement for the vendor to provide a fix immediately. In 
some cases, where this may be a very serious problem, out of scope fixes 
will be issued. If the problem reported is a major customer, the problem 
will be fixed quickly.

 
"Derek D. Martin" wrote:

> However, in practice, I've been on Bugtraq too long to think this
> actually accomplishes anything, in most cases.  In a few cases, mostly
> with free software like Apache, the "vendor" is very concientious and
> produces a fix immediately.  In many, many cases the vendor is
> notified, and months go by without even the hint of a fix. 
-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9