Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BBLISA: Re: Overqualified?!?!



While this is true, much depends on both the company, the union and the 
conditions upon which the union was brought in.  
There are many good things about a union as well as bad. When the union 
members, the union leadership and the company management can work together 
intelligently, then things work out. The real sticky issues come when there 
are jurisdictional issues. 
Back to my programmer/system admin analogy. The admin union might complain 
that the programmers are doing jobs that are traditional to admins. 

On 19 Jul 2002 at 12:20, Arthur Gaer wrote:

> Restrictive work rules are not inherent in collective bargaining and
> unionization.  Look at university faculty unions for example: noone tells
> a psychology professor that she can't start researching history, or
> writing papers on philosophy, or performing statistics in front of an
> entire class.  They don't even tell her she can't open up her computer,
> swap the hard drive out, load on RedHat 7.3 and configure her sendmail to
> be an open relay.  
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org