Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Distro comparison



On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:22:48PM -0400, Rich Braun wrote:
> Yup, that's a *1999*-vintage kernel running since summer '02.  It's not
> especially insecure, though, because it only runs Samba and a backup NTP
> server.  So long as that old kernel will keep running whatever security-patch
> level of these apps is required, I don't need to reboot.  

Uh, I seem to recall that all 2.2 kernels prior to the current release
had serious security holes that could result in escalated priviledges.
For example, all releases prior to 2.2.19 contained some form or other
of ptrace()/exec() bug which allowed a root compromise to local users.
If you allow your users to log in to the server with a shell, I would
consider that a problem.

-- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.
Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail.
Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031021/1df80b51/attachment.sig>



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org