Redhat 7.x and 8.x sunset

[ed at eh3.com (Ed Hill)]

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:18, Bill Horne wrote:
> With the sunset for Redhat 7.x and 8.x just a few days away, 
> I'd like a to do a straw poll: if you're using 7.x or 8.x, or 
> have already switched to something else, please respond and 
> tell the list your choice and the reason(s) for it.

Hi Bill,

I stopped using RH 7.x and 8.x on machines that I setup not long after
RH 9 came out.  I intend to stick with Red Hat and am currently using a
mix of:

  - RH 9 for my laptop and a few servers
  - Fedora Core 1 for a new testing box
  - RHEL AS v3 for a dual-Opteron compute server

and will switch to a mix of RHEL and Fedora as the RH 9 end-of-life
approaches.  RHEL WS/AS v3 is quite reasonable under their academic
pricing terms (WS: $25 or AS: $50) and has basically the same code base
as RH 9.

And to me, Fedora Core 1 seems to follow the pattern of of older Red Hat
".0" releases (eg. 5.0/6.0/7.0) -- its good but needs some polish.  I
expect it to get better over the coming months.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Room 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
            Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
email:   eh3 at mit.edu,  ed at eh3.com
URL:     http://web.mit.edu/eh3/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031224/8343a5ae/attachment.sig>