BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

colocation in the area

Subject: colocation in the area
From: dsr at tao.merseine.nu (dsr at tao.merseine.nu)
Date: Wed Sep 22 16:29:01 2004
In-reply-to: <20040922201119.WDUW24490.out014.verizon.net@outgoing.verizon.net>
References: <20040922201119.WDUW24490.out014.verizon.net@outgoing.verizon.net>

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:11:19PM -0400, paul.cour1 at verizon.net wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Care to elaborate on SAS 70 facility?
> > AT&T has a SAS-70 audited facility
> 

Here's a decent article:

http://www.ecomputerlaw.com/articles/mhtl/audits_can_evaluate.htm

Basically, it's an assurance that in the area of security, they
have a plan and a procedure and they know how to stick to it.

-dsr-

References:
- colocation in the area
  - From: paul.cour1 at verizon.net (paul.cour1 at verizon.net)

Prev by Date: colocation in the area
Next by Date: colocation in the area
Previous by thread: colocation in the area
Next by thread: Portscan yourself!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org