Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Which database...



On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Jerry Feldman wrote:

> On Wednesday 15 June 2005 3:47 pm, Kyle Plummer wrote:
> > Although not directly a linux question?  I have a client who is thinking
> > about using Oracle, IBM or MS SQL for a large DB project.  His question
> > to me is which is a more stable/reliable/scalable database?
> >
> > Thanks for your input.
> MS SQL locks you into a Windows server. 

MS SQL limits you in other ways, too.  I worked with a client who was 
using MS SQL Server Small Business.  The server was maxing out, so he 
spoke to MSFT about his options.  The Small Business licence/software is 
only designed for a certain load.  MSFT quoted him about $11,000 to go up 
to the next level.

He decided to take that $11,000 or so and put it towards rewriting the DB 
layer of the software to talk to MySQL instead ;)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
DDDD   David Kramer                   http://thekramers.net
DK KD  Math is pure science.
DKK D  Physics is noisy math.
DK KD  Chemistry is smelly physics.
DDDD   Biology is squishy chemistry.




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org