gcc 3.4 vs 4.0

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:34:48 -0500
Stephen Adler <adler at stephenadler.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking to do a rather major software upgrade. Currently the project 
> I'm working on is running 2.4 kernel flavored enterprise linux and I'm 
> looking to switch to the 2.6 kernel flavored enterprise linux. This 
> basically means moving from gcc 3.2 to gcc 3.4. I also have the option 
> of using gcc 4.0 instead. Does anyone have any advice of the advantages 
> of gcc 4 over gcc 3.4?
Someone on the SuSE list posted some problems she was having with
Oracle. The problem tends to be not so much with C objects but with C++.
The 4.0 compiler uses libstdc++.so.6.xxx where the 3.4 uses
libstdc++.so.5.xxx

Supposedly, the C++ ABI is supposed to be stable. 

In the enterprise arena, generally, 3rd party software is generally
certified for a specific platform/release, such as Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 4. 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20051124/17a7ef83/attachment.sig>