Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5



Quoting markw at mohawksoft.com:

> (1) There was nothing on the drives to read.
> (2) Read is almost always faster than write and write is usually the least
> cached data transfer, so, to me at least, write would seem to be the most
> indicative of real performance.
>
> I really just wanted to confirm some basic assumptions and thought the
> results might be useful to people thinking similarly.

I'm more worried about stability of the RAID in the face of drive failure..

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org