Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Parallel vs Serial speed



David Kramer wrote:
> markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> 
>> In the above examples, we see that the drives perform similarly, but that
>> the SATA interface gives an advantage in transfer speeds, but not the
>> 100mb/s vs 300mb/s advertised difference.
> 
> Here's something I don't understand.  My gut tells me that a parallel
> interface, which sends all the bits at once, should be several times
> faster than a serial interface, which must send one bit at a time.  So
> how is SATA faster than IDE?

Same reason parallel ports (old printer ports) went the way of the dodo in
favor of serial ports:  because it to get 8 pins (or whatever) to sync up
you have to run at a much slower rate (more than a factor of 8).

Matt

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org