Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Tethereal network capture



 Thanks. I am using Tshark now. 
I try to capture traffic between database server and 
application server because we have network problem. It 
frequently drops the connection. 

Any help is very appreciated. 

Thanks. 
-DP 
--- Jack Daniel <[hidden email]> wrote: 

> FWIW, Tetheral is technically obsolete, it was 
> abandoned when Ethereal was 
> abandoned last year.  Tshark is the CL version of 
> Wireshark, the new name 
> for the project. 
> 
> I think Kristian has spotted the syntax error in 
> your command. 
> 
> Jack 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Kristian Erik Hermansen 
> [mailto:[hidden email]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:49 PM 
> > To: Dave Peters 
> > Cc: [hidden email] 
> > Subject: Re: Tethereal network capture 
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/25/07, Dave Peters <[hidden email]> 
> wrote: 
> > > I try to use Tethereal to capture the network. I 
> use 
> > > this command to capture for the only host. 
> However, it 
> > > didn't work and capture everything. What's wrong 
> on 
> > > this? Can anyone help? 
> > > 
> > > tethereal -z io,stat,10,ip.addr==192.168.2.1> 
> file.log 
> > 
> > What packets were not captured?  Maybe looks like 
> you tried to snag 
> > everything goint to the gateway -- some packets 
> may be destined for 
> > broadcast 255.255.255.255 or 192.168.2.255 or 
> multicast 224.0.0.1 etc 
> > ... 
> > -- 
> > Kristian Erik Hermansen 
> > 
> > -- 
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> > believed to be clean. 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Discuss mailing list 
> > [hidden email] 
> > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Discuss mailing list 
> [hidden email] 
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org