Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: reply-to header



 I realized it was flame bait immediately after I hit Send and I apologize. 
Please, no one add your opinion to this thread! :^) 

Using the Reply-to-All command seems to be what most people do here and it 
gets the job done. 

On 11/26/07, Matthew Gillen <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> 
> Brendan Kidwell wrote: 
> > (META: If I understand correctly, I accidentally just sent this reply to 
> > only Brendan. Sorry about that. The list's messages don't seem to have a 
> > proper reply-to header.) 
> 
> That's a flame-war waiting to happen... Some people, (especially mutt 
> users), 
> would actually say that the list is configured correctly, and if you want 
> to 
> reply to the list, you should use the "Reply-to-list" option of your mail 
> client. 
> 
> There's been copious discussion about this in the past (since certain 
> popular 
> mail clients like Thunderbird have no such option), and I don't really 
> want to 
> get into it again, I just wanted to head off another round of it. 
> 
> Matt 
> 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org