Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debian/Ubuntu kernel update question



 On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> wrote: 

> 
> Just one other thing. I also think that Fedora and OpenSuSE also have 
> the incorrect strategies in that their updates leave only 1 kernel. My 
> personal preference is always to have a known good kernel. Before 
> modularization, I would always keep the generic monolithic kernel that 
> is known to work. So, at least, IMHO, OpenSuSE and Fedora should retain 
> at least the previous kernel. 


This is incorrect. Fedora retains two kernels: the newest one, and the 
currently-running one. The currently-running kernel is clearly a known 
good kernel, as it is in use at the time of the update. 


-- 
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux &amp; Unix 
GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: [hidden email] 
GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________ 
Discuss mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org