BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

KDE vs. GNOME session management

Subject: KDE vs. GNOME session management
From: mbr-rRLCkWC8vypBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org (MBR)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:30:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <495A5327.2090507-5a1Jt6qxUNc@public.gmane.org>
References: <495980C1.1090900@vl.com> <20081230031550.GE23228@redline.kinz.org> <495A5327.2090507@vl.com>

How about an Emacs buffer in dired mode?  More flexible and powerful 
than any GUI file manager I've ever encountered.

    Mark Rosenthal


Tom Metro wrote:
> Any recommendations for alternate file managers?
>
>   -Tom
>
>

References:
- KDE vs. GNOME session management
  - From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- KDE vs. GNOME session management
  - From: jkinz-+hffLmS/kj4 at public.gmane.org (jkinz-+hffLmS/kj4 at public.gmane.org)
- KDE vs. GNOME session management
  - From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)

Prev by Date: Csh /Tcsh Issue
Next by Date: Csh /Tcsh Issue
Previous by thread: KDE vs. GNOME session management
Next by thread: KDE vs. GNOME session management
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org