Fedora 11 has slipped another week.

[david-8uUts6sDVDvs2Lz0fTdYFQ at public.gmane.org (David Kramer)]

Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Apparently there was a bug in Anaconda that was fixed, but which 
> required a complete new testing cycle. After reading the description, I 
> fully agree with the Fedora team.
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-May/msg00011.html
> 
> I've been involved with software a long time, and why we were a bit 
> miffed that Fedora did not accommodate our installfest, it is sometimes 
> better to slip a release a bit and fix a critical problem. Everyone 
> ships with a certain number of known bugs, but there is always a 
> judgment call whether the bug is serious enough to delay a release 
> rather than provide a patch.

In the past, Fedora has been accused of releasing with several major 
bugs, and software in alpha state, so I support this too. Especially if 
it's the installer having the problem.  This one involves partitioning, 
as did a severe bug they released a few releases ago, so good call on 
their part.

Repartition failure can ruin your day.  Me, I'm fighting networking on 
my new Ubuntu install on my server, but I'll prolly post on that in a 
separate email (now that email is working).