Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

mail / mailx question



On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 01:07:14PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:37:22AM -0500, Chandler, Scott wrote:
> > Thanks for the ideas but I really don't want to change my current
> > config, it's working fine. 
> 
> It would seem that you need to reevaluate whether it really does work
> fine...  What DSR says is correct: Berkeley mail (or its clones)
> doesn't work the way you want.

'man 1 mailx' on my Fedora 12 box notes this option:

    smtp   Normally, mailx invokes sendmail(8) directly to  transfer
           messages.  If the smtp variable is set, a SMTP connection
           to the server specified by the value of this variable  is
           used  instead.  If the SMTP server does not use the stan-
           dard port, a value of server:port can be given, with port
           as a name or as a number.

So it does seem like mailx will support what Scott wants to do.  All the 
information and options are in the man page, which is a nice change for a 
linux machine.

-b

--
lisp doesn't look any deader than usual to me.         <david thornley>






BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org