Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Laptops and hardware virtualization



On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Shankar Viswanathan wrote:
> 
> There are security reasons why certain OEMs disable VT-x/AMD-V in the
> BIOS -- search for "Blue Pill" to see the gory details. While this
> hole has been demonstrated, I am not aware of any public exploits
> (perhaps because it is quite hard to create the necessary conditions).
> Still, disabling the extensions if you do not plan to use them is
> probably a good idea (my personal opinion, not my employer's).

I'm aware of Blue Pill.  I'm also aware that the claim of 100% undetectability is impossible on the x86 architecture.  Short version: there are privileged x86 instructions that aren't handled by VT-x/AMD-v.  Those instructions can be used to determine if the OS is running in a virtualized environment or not.

--Rich P.








BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org