BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tape vs disk cost
- Subject: Tape vs disk cost
- From: blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:46:26 -0400
- In-reply-to: <48555fa41003281845v25070f50oda870f2eef70ad3b-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
- References: <4BA9211D.3030400@blu.org> <4BAF55EA.5010108@mail2.gis.net> <4BAF71FA.2010403@blu.org> <4BAFE193.9080601@buttery.org> <48555fa41003281845v25070f50oda870f2eef70ad3b@mail.gmail.com>
> The current best I have found for large amounts of data is tape (in > some reasonably current form), > or 'archival DVD's. What's an archival DVD? Is that a special product? Whenever I burn and test DVD's, I would estimate the best-case half-life of a DVD is about 6-12 months. That is ... If I burn a bunch of DVD's, then approx 6 months later, half of them are bad.
- Follow-Ups:
- Tape vs disk cost
- From: jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org (Jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org)
- Tape vs disk cost
- References:
- SSD drives
- From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- SSD drives
- From: jbk-SkCWf5sxpj0sV2N9l4h3zg at public.gmane.org (jbk)
- SSD drives
- From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Tape vs disk cost
- From: mark-OGhnF3Lt4opAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org (Mark J Dulcey)
- Tape vs disk cost
- From: jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org (Jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org)
- SSD drives
- Prev by Date: ubuntu terminal directory
- Next by Date: ubuntu terminal directory
- Previous by thread: Tape vs disk cost
- Next by thread: Tape vs disk cost
- Index(es):
