Boston Linux & UNIX was originally founded in 1994 as part of The Boston Computer Society. We meet on the third Wednesday of each month at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in Building E51.

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Notes on VirtualBox



On 04/18/2010 11:19 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 04/18/2010 02:26 PM, Rich Braun wrote:
>  =20
>> Would love to hear others' comments.
>>
>> -rich
>>    =20
> Yup.  I've been using VB for several years now and have similarly found=
=20
> it to be excellent.
>
>
> I haven't used VMWare in anger in a long time.  But when I did have to =

> use it (VMW Player) recently, the things that stood out to me about it =

> that was very inferior to VB was a) the closed source aspect of it, and=
=20
> b) the installation process.
>
> Since it's closed source, there's obviously no package for it available=
=20
> via my distro.  And installation basically consisted of letting the=20
> installer - running as root, mind you! - do whatever it wanted to my sy=
stem.
>
> At best, my package manager had no knowledge of which files it=20
> installed, which is annoying.  At worst, the installer could have=20
> completely hosed my system, compromised its security, etc., and I would=
=20
> have had no idea what it did, or why, and so no idea how to fix it.
>
> I put up with such things under Windows, but I refuse to do so under=20
> Linux - especially when there's an open source app with the same=20
> functionality that works as good (if not better).
>
>  =20
I've been using VirtualBox for a long time. Recently, I've had a problem
running a 64-bit guest OS on VBox 3.1.6 as it tells me that my
processor's virtual assist is disabled although it is enabled in the
BIOS. I recently installed QEMU with KVM, and QEMU/KVM did work, but
with no sound from the GUI. I deinstalled QEMU, and reinstalled VBox,
and when I saw this email, I was able to boot a 64-bit guest OS. I found
that for a desktop VMM, Virtualbox and QEMU/KVM perform better than
VMWare Workstation, but as a caveat I have not personally benchmarked
VMWare for a few years. Currently I have Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 and Windows
XP (32-bit) running simultaneously both have sound. One annoyance with
QEMU/KVM was that it always prompted for root access although there is
probably a solution for that. VirtualBox uses 'vboxusers' as a group.
Both KVM and QEMU have entries in /etc/group.

BTW: VBox also comes with several utilities such as the ability to
convert a VBox .vdi file to a KVM image file.



--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846








BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org