Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Insight about LVM



> On 10/22/2011 08:55 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
>> I'm looking to hear from people using it, things they like, things they
>> dislike, oddities they've encountered, etc.
>
> Only negative I've heard is:
>
> If you have a logical volume that spans multiple HDD's, and one of the
> disks goes bad, the file system on your LV will be corrupted/lost.  (I
> think this is similar to RAID-0?)  So, IIRC, currently best practice is
> that if your goal is to make a large volume group made up of several
> physical volumes, that the physical volumes should be redundant RAID
> devices themselves to avoid this problem.

And that would be the same as any raid-0
>
> Perhaps someone else can confirm/refute this?
>
> HTH,
>
> DR
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org