Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] lvm snapshot cloning



On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:41 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> 
> With snapshots, its a bad design in that all snapshots receive all COW
> blocks. So if you have two snapshots with the same basic content, there
> will be duplicative data. This means that you have to allocate enough
> space for the changes N times depending on the number of snapshots.

This appears to be a bad design to you because you are thinking in terms of high-level file I/O.  And yes, I agree: it is very inefficient from the perspective of the high-level file system.  So don't do that.  Treat LVM volumes as simple block devices like I described.

If you won't do that then I can't help you.

--Rich P.




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org