Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Solaris vs. Linux (was Re: Dell docking and NVIDIA outputs)



On 01/27/2012 08:01 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
> Solaris has traditionally been a server operating system.  Sure, Sun made forays into desktops time and time again, and they even made a short-lived notebook, but their bread and butter has always been servers.  Which makes me wonder and ask, how well does it run on a notebook compared to other Unixly offerings (Linux, FreeBSD)?
The Polaroid ID division was using OpenSolaris on PCs in the lab and
Solaris on Sparc in production at the various states. Fortunately most
of my work was performed at home on my Alpha. I found one 64-bit issue
the entire code base. Years ago, most Unix vendors did produce
workstations. Sun, HP, Digital all had workstations. The emergence of
Linux on the PC essentially killed the workstations.

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:3BC1EB90 
PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66  C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org