Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] nfs hard links



Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> writes:

> Which as of the 1995 version 3 RFC, clearly defines LINK and SYMLINK
> protocol commands.   Unfortunately, it also documents that some
> servers might not support LINK or even SYMLINK and introduces a FSINFO
> command that a client can use to determine ahead of time if a server
> supports these or other features.   So the real answer is "it depends"
> on your local implementation.   See

    Yes, well, there's always room for that :)

    I still have un-fond memories of a certain platform whose
implementation of nfsv3 mknod() was panic().



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org