BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?

Subject: [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
From: rajiv at alum.mit.edu (Rajiv Aaron Manglani)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:05:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAMdng5sn_C3XRrFQ-mAFRQU+d9+ATpxS2JBmb-UU7NQxUHnXHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5146678D.4080902@gmail.com> <20130318015335.GQ27670@randomstring.org> <CAHyaXi2p7kaWD4Vmn0UD-ka_yP=XTBU5GQ-NMkdWU+bR7Ao7Qg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMdng5sn_C3XRrFQ-mAFRQU+d9+ATpxS2JBmb-UU7NQxUHnXHg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 18, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey <mark at buttery.org> wrote:
> Part of the problem is that email just isn't sexy right now. Young

here's a round up of interesting new email clients:

http://insideintercom.io/the-future-of-email-products/

References:
- [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
  - From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
  - From: randyokc at gmail.com (Randy Cole)
- [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
  - From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
Next by Date: [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
Previous by thread: [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
Next by thread: [Discuss] FOSS email that doesn't suck -- does such a thing exist?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org