Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Dev Ops - architecture (local not cloud)



On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote:

>
> NFS is not as fast as a local disk, but it should not be that slow.
>

I remember the first time I set up a NetApp fileserver,back in 1999. I
expected
that NFS would be slower than local disk, but I was hoping the performance
would still be acceptable.

We had one of the heaviest users run his overnight jobs both on his local
workstation and on the NetApp NFS share to compare times, and we discovered
that the NetApp's NFS share gave much *faster* throughput than his local
disks.

His local desktop was a high-end Sun Ultrasparc workstation with the RAM
maxed out and with fast SAS disks, tuned for maximum performance, yet
over a 100Mb Ethernet, the NetApp outperformed his workstation's local
disks.


-- 
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org