[Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance

[richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)]

F. O. Ozbek wrote:
> We have tested moosefs extensively. The commercial version has
> redundant metadata servers and redundant chunk servers.
> Ignoring fsync is not a problem. We will use in production
> for real data. (not scratch.)

Um. Yeah. Good luck with that. I think you'll need it. Because all the
redundancy in the world does you no good if the data doesn't get written
in the first place.

-- 
Rich P.