BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- Subject: [Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- From: effigies at riseup.net (Chris Johnson)
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 09:04:14 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1683637.ImKDo7NJRT@thinkpad>
- References: <1683637.ImKDo7NJRT@thinkpad>
On 09/07/2014 01:59 AM, Bill Horne wrote: > > OK, I'm not looking for entropy anymore. > > I just found an "old" key. It doesn't expire until 2017, so I don't > think I have to generate a new one. You can always change the expiry, so that shouldn't be what stops you using the key. > Here's another question, though: what key lengths are considered > "adequate" these days? This key is 4096 bits, which I'm confident is > long enough for now, but I'm curious what the "minimum" recommended > key length is these days. 2048 bit RSA is considered the minimum.
- References:
- [Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] How do I add entropy?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DNS providers
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] What key lengths are currently adequate?
- Index(es):
