Boston Linux & UNIX was originally founded in 1994 as part of The Boston Computer Society. We meet on the third Wednesday of each month at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in Building E51.

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] transmitting legal documents



True. But, as you mentioned there are several industries that are hold
outs,

On 02/22/2015 12:51 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> Unfortunately fax machines are a legal way to send information. While
>> today many transactions are done by email, fax is the only legally
>> recognized way to send a document.
> It's true that there are industries that are holdouts for using fax
> (like doctors), and few companies are wise enough to adopt open
> encryption standards, like S/MIME (instead fording you to use web sites
> or other proprietary encryption for sending secure messages), but there
> is no legal necessity to use fax.
>
> When you say "legally recognized way" it really comes down to what is
> recognized by the law and the courts as a legitimate way to sign a legal
> document, and that was addressed by the ESIGN Act in 2000.
>
> See:
> https://www.docusign.com/electronic-signature-legality
>
>   "...the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
>   (ESIGN, 2000) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA,
>   1999)...establish that electronic records and signatures carry the
>   same weight and legal effect as traditional paper documents and
>   handwritten signatures..."
>
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/253523/how_to_make_sure_that_digital_signature_is_legit.html
> http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/electronic-signatures-online-contracts-29495.html
> http://www.isaacbowman.com/the-history-of-electronic-signature-laws
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act
>
>
> We've executed consulting contracts using e-signatures.
>
> Read the PC World article above to see examples of the actual format
> that an e-signature takes. It has basically no security against being
> forged. The approach seems laughable but I guess PKI was beyond the
> grasp of legislators.
>
> When not using a third party service like DocuSign, we have clients
> digitally sign documents with PKI in addition to adhering to the ESIGN
> signature format.
>
>  -Tom
>

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:B7F14F2F
PGP Key fingerprint: D937 A424 4836 E052 2E1B  8DC6 24D7 000F B7F1 4F2F





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org