Question about the proc filesystem.

[Frank J. Ramsay]

On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 18:27, bpmedley at 4321.tv wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2001, Frank J. Ramsay wrote:
[snip]
> 
> This won't be much better, but I think it might be another option.  You
> could make a kernel module that overwrites the pertitent proc entry.
> I've never tried this, and you still would have to provide a module...

hey, that should work!  But if I'm writing the module I don't think I'd
put it in proc, or i'd atleast give it a different entry (I don't want
to screw up other progs that may look at these entries.)  Thanks!


			-fjr

-- 
Frank J. Ramsay
fjr at marsome.myip.org

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).