spam control again

[Jerry Feldman]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:29:10 -0500
"John Whitfield" <john_whitfield at email.com> wrote:

> Perhaps a better response would be to attack the business side of the
> problem.  Most spam is predicated on the idea that you can turn a
> profit even if only one person responds because the marginal cost of
> each email is near zero.  Spammers already complain (and we feel *SO*
> sorry for them) that their costs have been driven up by anti-spam
> efforts such as filters.
Unfortunately, a great deal of SPAM is pure junk, not even of any
commercial value. 
-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030715/70fd65a6/attachment.sig>