xbuffy on RHEL4

Steven L. Kleiman kleiman at math.mit.edu
Sat Aug 27 21:10:29 EDT 2005


Cc: jdm at moylan.info, mako at debian.org

Hi,
  RHEL4 too doesn't have xbiff, and so I downloaded the most recent
version of xbuffy I could find.  But here's what happened

$ rpm -i --test xbuffy-3.3-1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        libm.so.5 is needed by xbuffy-3.3-1.i386
        libc.so.5 is needed by xbuffy-3.3-1.i386
$ locate
libm.so.
/lib/libm.so.6
/lib/i686/libm.so.6
/lib/tls/libm.so.6

What did you do?  Did you link libm.so.5 to libm.so.6?  Did you
recompile from source?

Thanks, Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:18:17 -0500
From: "dan moylan" <jdm at moylan.info>
Subject: re: xbiff
To: "boston linux and unix (blu)" <discuss at blu.org>
Cc: benj mako hill <mako at debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain


benjamin writes:
>"dan moylan" date" Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:53:45AM -0500">
>> FC4 seems to have no xbiff nor have i been able to uncover
>> a replacement, if there is one.  anyone know?

> I currently use xbuffy which seems more powerful and
> flexible than xbiff. I have also used gbuffy and buffy.
> Buffy seems to be the latest and most actively maintained
> and has extension in quite a few languages for those that
> like to customize things.  As soon as I write up a
> xbuffy-like mode for buffy, I will probably switch to it.

i downloaded xbuffy and it does just what i need.  thanks.

dan



More information about the Discuss mailing list