We're back in Wonderland, where up is down and it's off with IBM's head in SCO's happy dreams.

[Brendan]

On Monday 05 February 2007, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:11:25 -0500
>
> Robert L Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > Not necessarily.  If IBM violated what amounts to a non-disclosure
> > agreement, they could be liable, but that wouldn't automatically make
> > downstream users liable for anything.  I would expect that there would
> > have to be an outright copyright (or patent) violation for downstream
> > users to have any liability
>
> This is another part of SCO's claim, but most of that has been thrown
> out.

Oh please god, no. Don't start the "what ifs" please. This is what ruined the 
Debian lists. The endless armchair legal teams....

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.