Drive mirroring - opinion wanted

John Abreau abreauj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sat Jun 6 17:08:19 EDT 2009


The part I consider most important is the automated part.
If the process is manual, then it won't be followed reliably.


On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jerry Feldman<gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 06/06/2009 02:41 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
>>
>> Ultimately, it depends on monitoring.  If you have a mechanism that  will
>> alert you to a fault then mirroring is fine.  If you do not then  you're
>> probably better off keeping things as they are and using a  chunk of the 1TB
>> disk for regular, automated backups that do notify  you if there is a fault.
>>
>
> I check my nightly backup logs frequentl;y. I back up to a USB device which
> has the additional feature of being portable. In the case of a lightning
> strike, all 3 drives will have been cremated :-)
>
> --
> Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
> Boston Linux and Unix
> PGP key id: 537C5846
> PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>



-- 
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99






More information about the Discuss mailing list