[Discuss] Thin Provisioned LVM

[markw at mohawksoft.com]

> On 3/12/2015 12:14 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
>> Exactly my point, by the way. I don't want ZIL for some applications. It
>> isn't a misunderstanding, I've looked over the code intensely looking
>> for
>> some way to provide this functionality.
>
> I disbelieve. Globally disabling the ZIL was an unsupported tunable from
> Day 1 (it was used internally at Sun to isolate different parts of ZFS
> for performance analysis). ZIL synchronicity was implemented as a
> per-dataset option in 2010.

So, what is it?