[BLU/Officers] Opinions on pgp keys with no identity?

[John Abreau]

There are currently 2 keys registered for the keysigning party that have no
identity attached:

   * F922B906 (keybase.io/anhar)
   * 48818E6E (b5d1f0f4-455f-430d-96de-b832d00bd5ef)

I don't see how we can fit them into our keysigning procedure in a manner
where we can adequately establish a proper level of trust for these keys.

I'm tempted to delete them from the check sheet, so they won't cause
confusion for tomorrow's BLU meeting.

What are your thoughts?


-- 
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/officers/attachments/20150915/4dfb52c8/attachment.html>