Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
the reason I want to upgrade is actually pretty good -- I've got a real live commercial situation where I get to use Linux, and another development group I'm working with is running on 1.3.72. I personally would tend to stay with my 1.2.8 system since it's behaving. more linux for the people... I get to sit at the zsh prompt and watch dust gather on my win 95 machine's keyboard... At 09:15 PM 3/14/96 -0500, you wrote: >On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> > ok kernel kowpersons if I want to upgrade from kernel rev 1.2.8 to kernel >> > rev 1.3.72 how much do I need to change? >> >> I would recommend that you only upgrade to 1.2.13 unless you really >> need to use features that exist in the 1.3 development kernels. >> >> As for what you need to upgrade, theoretically all you should need >> toupgrade is the kernel itself. However you may need to upgrade >> applications which use kernel features, like ipfw, multicast, etc. > >Actually, the 1.3 kernels are pretty stable now. There are potentially a >number of good reasons to upgrade, including support for new network and >sound cards, and support for SMB and AppleTalk protocols in the main >kernel sources. > >There are a couple of things besides the kernel that you have to replace >if you upgrade; for example, the old versions of ps and top got broken >somewhere in the fifties, and PPP and FTape were broken by 1.3.33. New >versions of these things ONLY work with new kernels unless you apply >patches to 1.2.13, making another good reason to upgrade (if you want >FTape support for Travan drives, for example). > > > Rodney Thayer :: rodney at sabletech.com Sable Technology Corp :: +1 617 332 7292 246 Walnut St :: Fax: +1 617 332 7970 Newton MA 02160 USA :: http://www.shore.net/~sable "Developers of communications software"
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |