Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Rodney Thayer wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: RT> My experience with Cyrix is that if you call them as a RT> software developer they are arrogant and also oh by the way RT> imply they are revising their chips all the time. Their RT> idea of solving compatability problems is "tell the end user RT> to go trade in their motherboard, the next one is sure to RT> have a newer rev. chip, we rev. the chip all the time". RT> So if you have a motherboard with a Cyrix chip, learn how to RT> pull it and put in another CPU. RT> No, I don't love Intel, in fact I am rather militant about RT> being anti-monopoly if I have the opportunity, so for RT> example I would be happy to try to use an IBM, or an AMD or RT> one of these other x86x chips, I just don't do RT> vendor-with-attitude-problem. I can tell you that my experience is completely opposite to yours. Cyrix has been unfailingly helpful in supporting their chips, and has been willing to send out anything I wanted. Certainly, Cyrix has been more forthcoming with engineering information than Intel in my personal experience. It's too bad I don't like the 6x86, because I do like the company. -- Mike
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |