Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Rodney Thayer wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: RT> with a contemporary motherboard, why not buy a cheapo second RT> IDE drive and make it the second unit? There is no advantage to this. Unlike SCSI, the system is totally hosed when doing operations involving an IDE device. As a result, the two IDE devices will simply alternate CPU usage. The world runs Windows 95, where the operating system cannot make use of the free time even if the hardware provides it, so IDE incurs no penalty. For Linux, NT, OS/2, or any other competent operating system, a far better and cheaper route to increased performance is to use SCSI. One decent SCSI drive will outperform two cheap IDE drives. -- Mike
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |