GNU/Linux naming debate

[JerryC at world.std.com (Jerry A Clabaugh)]

I have no flame insurance, so I also have no opinion on this subject.
But here is a table of the contents of
the SuSE 5.2 distribution:

Code Contribution Distribution for S.u.S.E. 5.2

          Package Name: suse5.2.codd
          Package Size: +514659722 bytes.

            1.uncredited: 82733250 (16.075%)
            2.free software foundation, inc: 51254116 (9.958%)
            3.sun microsystems, inc: 38243234 (7.43%)
            4.the regents of the university of california: 23581801
(4.582%)
            5.x consortium: 18163125 (3.529%)
            6.thomas g. lane: 8464917 (1.644%)
            7.the university of washington: 7832780 (1.521%)
            8.digital equipment corporation: 7206660 (1.4%)
            9.snns group, ipvr, univ: 4366722 (0.848%)
           10.aladdin enterprises: 4108079 (0.798%)
           11.silicon graphics, inc: 3680070 (0.715%)
           12.robert nation: 2465545 (0.479%)
           13.maorong zou: 2438025 (0.473%)


This table is at:
 http://www.vipul.net/codd/suse5.2.R.html .  I can't vouch for the
correctness of this table, but shooting
from the hip, nothing leaps out as being obviously wrong.

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).