Regarding the RAM disk and associated issues...

[richard at aoi.ultranet.com (Richard Royston)]

Bill Horne wrote:

> 3.  Why does ls -d (in RH 5.2) give only the current "." directory, and
> not the other (sub)directory entries in a particular directory?

Try "ls -d *", but that will give you all the files, not just the 
subdirectories. It does, however, suppress the contents of the 
sub-directories. If you really only want the subdirectories themselves, try:

	ls -F | egrep "/"

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Richard J. Royston                             68 Baldwin Street
richard at aoi.ultranet.com                       Apartment 22
(617) 242-5280                                 Charlestown, MA 02129


-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).