DDD && xwpe (fwd)

[jrv at vanzandt.mv.com (James R. Van Zandt)]

Chuck Young <cyoung at bbnplanet.com> writes:
>I have already asked the only emacs fanatic I know if he would be
>interested.  I was thinking 40 minutes for DDD 40 minutes for xwpe
>and 40 minutes on emacs (I know emacs could go all night, but then
>couldn't everything go on all night?  :-))
>
>>Xemacs (or emacs if you don't like color or non-Courier fonts) should
>>be added to the agenda, since it and "make" form the primary "IDE"
>>under Linux.
>>
>>I couldn't help but think "just like in Emacs", many times during the
>>talk when a particular feature was shown.  As it stands, the product
>>they had was not much more than a file manager.

If one covered just the compile mode (parsing the compile messages and
opening the source line in error) and debug mode (keeping the source
window aligned with the current execution point), one could cover
enough in 40 min to get people interested.

	     - Jim Van Zandt
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).