Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> On a tangential topic, why would anyone want to use proxy services when > IP masquerading was available? Customization. If you want to limit the internet access a machine is given, it's a helluva lot easier to do so with a proxy, than attempting to go in and work with masquerading in such a manner. The purpose of masquerading is generally to allow a machine to think it's directly connected to the internet and have it interact in such a manner. While masquerading is generally a better alternative to a proxy server if this is your purpose, there is a still a purpose, if a little bit different, for a proxy server. I know this is a weak argument, as I personally masquerade both my home and portions of the network at my job, but I wanted to stand up for proxy servers in that they do have _some_ purpose and are not completely obsolete (yet). Brian Conway dogbert at clue4all.net - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |