Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> On Mon, 2 Aug 1999 Chris DiTrani <cditrani at ne.mediaone.net> wrote: > > > I've noticed that on 2 RH5.2 and on 6.0 machines I have this strange > > recursive tree: /usr/bin/mh/mh/mh/mh/mh/mh........ It seems to go on for > > quite a while this way, and as far down as I travel into it there seems to > > exist the same files. I can't imagime this is normal. Anyone seen this? > > /usr/bin/mh is a symlink to ".", which makes /usr/bin/mh a reference to > /usr/bin. The behavior you're seeing is a natural side effect of this. > > /usr/bin/mh is the original installation directory for the Rand MH, and > some third-party tools depended on it; hence the symlink to maintain > backwards compatibility. In my opinion, this is a silly hack. If RedHat builds the packages from source, they should be able to control things better than this. A few years back, this type of recusive linking provided endless headaches when used with tar, find & cpio, and even worse was the unix-unaware vender that ported crummy code. +------------------------ | christoph | linuxguy at ici.net | http://home.ici.net/~linuxguy - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |