Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
What do folks think about switching to SUSE for the distribution? It seems to be a better distribution than RedHat, in that 1. The book in the package contains actual information on how to use Linux, and detail about the configuration, as opposed to instructions, like "to install the program, press the install button". 2. RedHat omits quite a few programs I like, e.g., xemacs, seyon, hylafax. 3. RedHat includes too much new software that's not yet complete. For example, in 6.0, 'gdm' is the default window manager, yet it has the fatal flaw for networked installations of not creating TCP xauthority cookies. In 5.2, they included a version of glibc that didn't (yet) support netgroups, so all rcmd functions (used by lpr) stopped working for me. Also, what do folks think about Caldera as an alternative? I've been reading reviews that say their new installation program is slick. They also claim that they're interested in stability first... Do they supply a book, and is it any good? I suppose I should just get a $25 copy at BJ Wholesale and see for myself... - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |